Practitioner template
User Access Review
Evaluate current user and service-account access against approved GxP roles, responsibilities, least privilege, and segregation of duties.
Download TemplateBlank template
- System and review period
- Approved GxP and privileged roles
- User or service account
- Current job responsibility and owner
- Assigned access
- Access appropriate
- Segregation of duties
- Inactive or terminated status
- Exception and expiry
- Action and completion evidence
- Reviewer and approver
- Conclusion and next review
Completed fictional example
Fictional teaching example: This is not an executed or approved validation record.
- System and review period
- Fictional eQMS; annual review
- Approved GxP and privileged roles
- Investigator, Quality approver, administrator, read only
- User or service account
- Former Quality reviewer now IT support
- Current job responsibility and owner
- Application support; IT manager
- Assigned access
- Quality approver and administrator
- Access appropriate
- No; approval is not required for support
- Segregation of duties
- Approval plus administration creates conflict
- Inactive or terminated status
- Active employee; employment alone does not justify role
- Exception and expiry
- Temporary support exception expires in five days
- Action and completion evidence
- Approval removed; ticket-based elevation retained; activity reviewed
- Reviewer and approver
- Process owner and Quality approval
- Conclusion and next review
- Appropriate after removal; next scheduled or role-change review