Practitioner template
AI Change Assessment
Determine whether an AI model, prompt, source, retrieval, parser, guardrail, workflow, or role change affects approved use or demonstrated performance.
Download TemplateBlank template
- Change and authoritative information
- Approved intended use
- Affected AI and GxP functions
- Prompt, source, retrieval, or parser impact
- Model or version impact
- Guardrail, workflow, tool, or role impact
- Acceptance-criteria impact
- Regression and critical-miss evaluation
- Human-review impact
- Rollback, monitoring, and stop criteria
- Release decision
- Revalidation criteria and approval
Completed fictional example
Fictional teaching example: This is not an executed or approved validation record.
- Change and authoritative information
- Fictional provider model quality update and parser 3.2
- Approved intended use
- Source-linked protocol review comments; no approval authority
- Affected AI and GxP functions
- Finding generation and scanned-table parsing
- Prompt, source, retrieval, or parser impact
- Parser changes table extraction; prompt and corpus unchanged
- Model or version impact
- Provider label is minor but exact behavior may change
- Guardrail, workflow, tool, or role impact
- No action permissions; source-open requirement retained
- Acceptance-criteria impact
- Critical-miss criteria by format remain controlling
- Regression and critical-miss evaluation
- Locked reference set shows two new critical scanned-table misses
- Human-review impact
- Source inspection falls under representative workload
- Rollback, monitoring, and stop criteria
- Retain prior path; exclude scanned tables; monitor critical misses and source opens
- Release decision
- Approve supported text documents only after controls pass
- Revalidation criteria and approval
- Model, parser, prompt, source, role, threshold, or critical incident; Quality approval